Neural Network Modeling of Ionospheric F2-Layer Electrodynamics

· past · ionosphere, machine learning, neural networks, space weather

Neural Network Modeling of Ionospheric F2-Layer Electrodynamics
Spatial (longitude–latitude) distributions of NmF2 (left) and hmF2 (right) simulated using an ANN-based global 3D ionospheric model under quiet (Kp = 2) and disturbed (Kp = 9) conditions. [Source: Tulasi Ram et al. (2018), Fig. 10]

This project developed one of the earliest neural-network–based ionospheric models capable of predicting global F2-layer peak density (NmF2) and peak height (hmF2) from long-term satellite and ground-based measurements. The work demonstrated that machine-learning approaches can replicate large-scale ionospheric electrodynamics traditionally captured only by empirical or physics-based models.

Context & Motivation

The high-latitude ionosphere is a dynamic plasma environment controlled by solar EUV radiation, geomagnetic forcing, and neutral wind circulation. Accurate estimates of NmF2 (peak electron density) and hmF2 (corresponding altitude) are essential for radio communication forecasting, satellite navigation accuracy, and space weather nowcasting.

Traditional ionospheric models fall into two camps:

However, both approaches struggle with nonlinear responses to geomagnetic storms, solar minima, and Equatorial Ionization Anomaly. With the advent of large-scale radio occultation (RO) datasets from FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC, CHAMP, GRACE, and global Digisonde GIRO network, machine learning offered a viable alternative.

This project explored that possibility.

Approach / Methods

The core methodology was a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) trained to map observed and modeled ionospheric conditions, magnetic fields, solar activity, and winds to NmF₂ and hₘF₂.

Neural network architecture
Architecture of the feed-forward neural network used in artificial neural network-based global three-dimensional ionospheric model. DOY = day of the year; UT = universal time. [Source: Tulasi Ram et al. (2018), Fig. 2]

Key elements:

Key Results & Findings

Dip latitude variation and spectral analysis
Dip latitude variation of zonally averaged day time (a) NmF2 and (b) hmF2 as a function of day number and the corresponding [Lomb–Scargle periodogram](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lomb%E2%80%93Scargle_periodogram) of (c) NmF2 and (d) hmF2. The superimposed black curves in left panels indicate the daily averaged [Kp-index](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-index). The white curves in right panels indicate the periodogram of daily averaged Kp-index. [Source: Gowtham et al. (2019), Fig. 7]

Implications / Applications

Further Reading